Go Back   HomePokerGames Poker Forum > FORUMS > COMMENTS

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-04, 07:00 PM
union333
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
re: chan's loss at wsop 2003I dont really blame him for going all in with K-5 suited. H ewas getting no action the entire night and for him to get any sort of pile he had to hjave action brought to him. A bit risky yes, but there was no way he could have known moneymaker had ace-8 in the same suit.
  #2  
Old 05-05-04, 07:00 PM
Burt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chan probably just wanted to not ride that short stack out another day. He was either doubling up or going home with the K5 of hearts. Besides, he probably won that 10,000 back in about 10 minutes of high stakes action.
  #3  
Old 05-09-04, 07:00 PM
Matt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Looking at Chan's call from his perspective, it is probably the right move. Let's say he puts Moneymaker on an ace, but no flush draw. Then, Chan has 9 heart outs plus 4 gutshot straight outs. Add in runner-runner ks, 5s, or k5, and he probably thinks he is actually a slight favorite, about 11:10. Combine that with his shortstack and a good-sized pot, seems like as good a time as ever to push in the rest of it.
  #4  
Old 05-10-04, 07:00 PM
SP.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
He is the KING... 9 bracelets says it all
  #5  
Old 05-18-04, 07:00 PM
Jammer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Johnny and Hon Le absolutely rock!
  #6  
Old 05-21-04, 07:00 PM
medcrew3
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
watch out for this guy, i think he has a bright future in poker........ mine will be brighter... MGT
  #7  
Old 05-21-04, 07:00 PM
ghost of stu unger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
man i wish i was still playin
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.